Tuesday, November 7, 2023

Milton Stern: Beloved Teacher, Piano Virtuoso, Friend

Milton Stern: March 6, 1929 - September 29, 2023

Memoir by Greg Sandell
November 7, 2023

for Adam, Diana and Oliver


"Why don't you try Dr. Stern's class? He's good with young people."


El Patron restaurant, Altadena.

This was spoken to me by Henry Jackson, professor of piano at Cal State University Los Angeles, who resembled Cheswick from One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest.  He'd just listened to me struggle through Chopin's Revolutionary Etude. He probably didn't know what to make of me: I didn't resemble a typical classical piano student. I had long hair halfway down my back tied in a ponytail, torn jeans and a Pignose t-shirt.


When I showed up at Milton Stern's master class, I saw a man with a silky, partly unbuttoned shirt, a gold necklace in his chest hair, gold rings with opals, sporty glasses, a mustache, a rich tan…basically, a 70's swinger.  And a New York accent.




But he made me feel welcome, invited me to play my etude, and had this to say when I was done:  "I'm disappointed in you."


"I’m disappointed, not so much over how you played, but for what you aren't doing with those wonderful hands of yours."


He wanted me to scoot the piano bench much farther away from the piano because of my long arms.  "You're what we call in Yiddish a lang lokshn…a long noodle."  Then, addressing the girls, "You need to sit where your bikini underwear meets the edge of the bench," producing giggles.  "Look," he said, sitting his butt all the way back on the piano bench. He picked up a score and started leafing through it.  "I'm on the toilet, reading my magazine, hum, hum.. (the girl next to me made silent convulsing laughter in her hands) …oh! I dropped it!"  The "magazine" fell to the floor.  "Let me pick that up…oof, ugh!" and he made a display of not being able to pivot from where he's sitting to reach it.  "I can’t reach sitting this far back. Sitting on the edge of the bench gives you the degree of freedom to transfer your weight to the different parts of the keys."

with Greg Sandell. At Ellen Kravitz home, ca 1978


He then taught the rest of the Stern piano doctrine, passed down to him from the teachings of Isabella Vangerova and Josef and Rosina Lhévinne:  use the weight of the forearm, the wrist as a shock absorber, position your hand in a high arch, straight fingers from the knuckle, and strike the key like a hammer from the knuckle down, cushioning it with the pad of your fingertip.


He demonstrated for us what playing with weight could accomplish.  He played us Ravel's virtuoso piece Alborada del gracioso, bringing such power and savagery to the recap that the whole grand piano, suspended on its wheeled piano dolly, oscillated up and down.  Another was Liszt's Sonetto del Petrarca 104, with its alternating passages of thunderous chords and soft, delicate virtuoso flourishes.  Everyone who has heard him play 104 has never forgotten it.

When some of the other students gave impressive performances of virtuoso piece like Prokofiev 3rd Sonata, the Beethoven "Tempest" Sonata, and the Chopin Scherzo in C# Minor, I began to wonder what I was doing there.  These kids had to have started at a much younger age than me, driven by a parent to practice for hours a day.  But he believed in me, I began to take private lessons with him, and I gained one of the greatest mentors and friends a person could have.

with Andrew Levin and Opus 1 at
Cal State LA. For a performance of
Mozart Piano Concerto Piano Concerto
No. 17 in G major, KV. 453


He taught brilliantly because he cared about his students and wanted to nurture their souls through self-discovery.  He was a great egalitarian.  Whether you came from Pasadena blue blood or the east LA barrio, he didn't see class. He looked for your goodness or helped you find it.  If you were a closed book to him, he’d extend you credit that you had beauty inside, soon to be revealed. 


I'd run into him in the halls of the Music Department when I was on a practice break, wearing his leather jacket and carrying his small valise that he called his Ditty Bag, leaving for home.  "Walk with me, hero," he said, and we took the stairs to the parking lot.  We'd chat a bit about our last lesson before I returned to the practice rooms, or he'd give me a lift to my apartment in his Datsun 280Z.  He'd tell me of professors who were his friends, and it was through those conversations that I came to take Art History with Arlene Quint, Yoga with Pat White and Balkan line dancing with Dan Brown.  Then he'd drive up to his house in the Altadena hills where I imagined he carried on some kind of extraordinary life.


with Greg Sandell and Andrew Levin.
Stern home, Altadena
In fact, his house was full of a very particular kind of art and books. Posters of Seattle productions of Wagner’s Ring. There were two four-foot-high, rough-hewn sculptures showing athletes in great states of exertion, muscles bulging. One was a pair of wrestlers, another engaged in an Olympic feat, launching an iron ball attached to a cord. Books of erotic art by Aubrey Beardsley, decadent novels by Wilde and Huysmans.  An upright piano decorated with brass fittings and plates had a candlestick mounted on either side of the player.  He showed me a trap door in the ceiling containing a small space surrounded in white shag where he said he went to retreat and find peace.  He described his plan for building a slide that would run from his upstairs bedroom sun deck into the pool below, for him and his girlfriend to go straight from love making to a dunk in the pool.

The words sensual and sensuality seemed to permeate much of his conversation.  Yes, some of it was straight up about sex, but there was a bigger picture: his belief that the most human experience possible was to experience life through sensations, whether physical, mental, literary, or musical.  This was not the kind of message you typically got from a piano teacher. Most of them taught you to transmit only what was written on the page and nothing about yourself.  As a musician who himself was taught by some of the great turn of the century romantic pianists, Milton Stern devoted himself to teaching students how to use their own living being to bring Chopin or Beethoven's humanity from the page, through their feelings, and out to the listener to hear.

Family photo


Milton identified to an uncanny degree with the psychological state of students in their late teens.  Perhaps he remembered the struggle of his own adolescence all too well: sex is on your mind, and, being not much older than a child, you crave entertainment and laughter.  "Grab their hearts, and their minds will follow," was a favorite phrase of his.


Sensuality could be savage, as he showed in Ravel's Alborada del gracioso, or even painful, as he would show in Renaissance paintings of Saint Sebastian, pierced by arrows. Where I saw him to have an oddly melancholy look, Stern relished it as an expression of pain combined with exquisite pleasure.  Or he'd urge you to listen and experience the orgasmic-sounding passages of Wagner's Tristan or Die Walküre, Mahler's Symphony No 2 or Charles Griffes’ Pleasure Dome of Kubla Kahn.  


To express these things as a pianist, you needed strong piano fundamentals.  One thing he talked about was the Long Line, the ability to shape a melody like a singer or violinist.  He could play a melody with gradations of color and dynamics that made your playing sound black-and-white and cardboard.  But if you watched his hand…with the silk sleeve, tan and the opal-encrusted rings…it would do a kind of ballet that was an analogue of the sound he attained.  You could almost get his sound by imitating his hand.  The movement was so innate for him that when you watched him learn a new piece or sight-read, you'd see that his “stage 1” was figuring out the motion of his hand.  Memorizing the notes and fingering took a back seat. Most of us do the opposite.  


Long Line, like the ability to "swing" in jazz, is a gift, and one that came naturally to him.  He could be appalled when you clunked down on a note at the end of a phrase that was supposed to taper away.  He'd compare it to a beautiful woman with flawlessly applied makeup, grotesquely ruined by a tiny lipstick smear.   To him, clunking that note made about as much sense as holding down the pedal through several changes of harmony…who does that? To this day, I still work at finding the Long Line.  One might not have the gift, but one can learn it.

with Andrew Levin in Houston, for a performance
of Bortkiewicz Piano Concerto No 1


A lesson with Milton was seldom boring.  People who walked by his studio, which happened to be a highly trafficked area near the Music Department administrative office, would sometimes be treated to unusual sounds. When he was coaching you to solve a problem, and you were trying and retrying to get it right, he resembled a frenzied theater director, shouting louder and louder in between your attempts, “No! … More legato! …Yuck, wrong notes! …Too slow! …Flutter the pedal!” and finally yelling in your face "THANK YOU!!" with mock passive-agressiveness, when you at last got it right. 


He'd share interesting secrets of transcendent virtuoso technique.  He'd show you how to strike a big chord "with a glancing blow", so as to ring the piano like a giant bell, loud and powerful, but not harsh. Chords could be made to sparkle by arpeggiating them from the top very fast, with no one the wiser.  An octaves passage with large leaps could be helped with the technique he called "blind octaves."


with Greg Sandell and Paul Van Ness.
Cal State LA, ca. 1980

More than anything else, it was his humor was that grabbed our hearts.  He had the knack of a Victor Borge to entertain at the piano.  If a student made an excuse, he'd run to the piano and played a melancholy song…we heard it dozens of times without knowing what it was…smiling ear to ear, his eyebrows going up and down like Groucho Marx.  He cracked himself up with that each time. Eventually I found out it was "Nobody Knows the Troubles I Seen."


He told the story of his friend at Oberlin who botched the lightning-bolt opening of Chopin's Sonata No 3 in B minor landing on a a very off-key F-natural instead of the written F-sharp.  "He never recovered."

He'd demonstrate how to get a gentle touch, by negative example. He'd start the left hand of Chopin's C minor Nocturne and create a romantic and elegant atmosphere. While keeping a detached, refined demeanor, he would rain down unforgiving sledgehammer blows for the melody.  

There was Beethoven's Sonata in G, Op 31 No 1, which has unique syncopations between left and right hands in the first movement.  He'd play it, as written, joking, "the poor guy can't keep his hands together!"  

He would play the 3rd variation of the 2nd movement of Beethoven's Sonata in C minor op 111 and we laughed over how Beethoven had anticipated boogie-woogie by a century or more.

Some of his salty humor came from his days in the Air Force.  One expression was a warning to be careful, or "you'll be screwed, blued, and tattooed."  Another piece of advice was to be wary of venturing more information than you need to.  With Rabbinical eyebrows and a Brooklyn/Yiddish accent, he said, "Nobody's pulling your tongue out of your mouth to tell the truth."

with Greg Sandell and Patrick Lindley.
Stern home, Altadena.

If you were preparing a sensual, emotional piece for a recital, he'd smile and tell you, "there won't be a dry pair of pants in the house."    He'd describe a fast, savage piece as "balls out".  He had a variation on this if a piece was even faster and more savage.  Then it would be "balls flying in all sorts of directions."


He spoke of composers like they were pals at the golf course:  "Dickie Wagner," "John Brahms," and "Dickie Strauss."   He told us that as a young man Brahms played piano in brothels and was adored by the girls (supposedly).


When he had to endure an emotionless performance, it was "death warmed over."  When students came to him with impressive levels of technique already, but who were taught it to the exclusion of feelings, they were "fingerbusters."  On the other hand, a fingerbuster could also be the description of a difficult piece.  "Beethoven's Waldstein, that's a real fingerbuster." 


with David Lowenkron, 93rd Birthday
party. Stern home, Altadena

One the qualities that I especially loved was his questing, exploratory nature.  He was searching for anything that might hold the key to a world of insight and understanding. He was always sharing a discovery he made with me, perhaps a book he found life-changing, or a obscure painter with an unusual style.  


He was excited by the possibilities for personal transformation that psychotherapy could bring, both as a patient and as a lay practitioner to people he thought he could help. He was open to making piano study a personal journey as well, and brought compassion and empathy to turmoils experienced by his young adult students.  You could turn to him in a crisis and he'd welcome it.

For a time he took up a mission to make a cross-disciplinary synthesis of Music and Sports Medicine.  For piano works of virtuoso difficulty, the risks of tendinitis and carpal tunnel syndrome through overexertion were just as "athletic" a concern as avoiding and recovering from a football knee injury.  He had noticed that problems often started with tension in the thumb, and he coined the phrase "the thumb is the key to the wrist."  For years he had drummed into his students’ minds to be wary of practicing too long without break, or playing through pain, else they'd experience an "injury."  Not all pianists he spoke to were receptive to using that word.


As a confirmed Romanticist, avant garde and contemporary music were not his cup of tea, but he had had his encounters with it.  As a student at Oberlin, he once played Bartok's Piano Sonata at a party, "and I cleared the room."  For a time he studied with Eduard Steuermann who was assistant to Arnold Schoenberg and premiered many of his pieces.  At Cal State LA he was asked by faculty composer Byong-Kon Kim to perform one of his pieces.  It was emotionally opaque to him at first; so he got creative and found his own way to give it life.  Despite the extreme liberties he had taken with the score, Professor Kim was overjoyed with the performance and asked him to record it later.


He wasn't beyond a little modification to the great literature either.  Sometimes this scandalized me, like recommending that I hold the pedal through a passage marked staccato, or adding a crescendo where none was indicated.  But I knew where it was coming from:  with his breadth of knowledge of the piano literature, he understood composers' musical language, their soul.  A slight deviation from the score was a small price to pay when, in the end, the audience's emotional experience was what the composer intended.  I still play one of the climaxes of Liszt's Sonetto del Petrarca 104 the way he advocated, modifying which of the notes fall on the downbeat.

Demonstrating a melody


As effusive as he could be socially, at lessons his assessment of your progress could be peculiarly cautious.  I must have come to a dozen lessons, proud that I had just memorized a new piece or improved greatly upon it, only to hear once again, "it's really coming along."  After playing a Rachmaninoff Etude Tableau for him, he said one word: "remarkable."  But if you really made progress, or broke through, he’d let you know.   Once I was rewarded with, “Finally, there’s the pianist I knew you had inside you!” 


I'm driving my car up Lake Ave in Pasadena to reach his Altadena house for what must be the 30th time.  I had moved away years ago but I'd visit him every time I was in town.  Later, when I returned to California and resumed studies with him in his late 80's, and clocked even more trips up that hill, I had a sad reflection. Will one day be my last trip up Lake?


In his 90's, he could still give an inspired lesson, despite failing eyesight, lack of mobility, and vulnerability to fatigue. He had urged me to take lessons weekly again, saying that it was the only way to accelerate my improvement.  He was right, I got better, I broke through some barriers.  But more to the point, he simply thrived on teaching.  Many times I picked up the phone and heard his plaintive voice ask, "when are you coming for a lesson?"


At the last lesson I took with him, he was weak, his voice gravelly.  But as I was leaving, he summoned the strength to say:  "I want you to know I'm very impressed and proud of how much progress you've made.  And I'm not just saying that you know, I really do mean it."  

With Carol Ann and Greg Sandell.
Lake Street, Pasadena


Two weeks later I visited him again to listen to some music together on my iPhone and Bluetooth speaker.  I brought him Rachmaninoff songs and piano pieces by Medtner and Bortkiewicz.  During Spring Torrents, the Rachmaninoff song I'd heard him perform long ago with singer Lu Elrod, I saw him pull one of his funny faces, the one that says "stop it, the sensuality's killing me!"  


Two weeks later, we lost him.  Rest in Peace, hero.



Monday, January 6, 2020

Tony Sandell "Music Minus One's" three Zappa tracks

My beloved brother Tony has been drumming for 45+ years, and has been an ardent Frank Zappa fan for about as long.  Besides being an ace drummer, he has, shall we say, "drummer's perfect pitch":  whatever the drummer is doing in any track he listens to, goes straight to his muscle memory and stays there.

Just after New Year's Day he graced a few of us by playing his electronic drumset to three Frank Zappa tracks.  Here is Florentine Pogen from One Size Fits All (1975)


Here is the medley Oh No - Orange County Lumber Truck -Trouble Every Day from Roxy and Elsewhere (1974)



And finally, St. Alphonzo's Pancake Breakfast from Apostrophe' (1974).  He rather modestly pointed out, "I'm barely ready to play this one."




Wednesday, December 4, 2019

Zappa in Memorium


Frank Vincent Zappa, December 21, 1940 – December 4, 1993

Because I did one of those "Album Challenges" on Facebook last week, where I visited musical influences from long ago, I feel the need to observe the anniversary of Frank Zappa's passing on Dec 4, 1993, at the age of 52.  Besides, it comes up every year on my iPhone's calendar.  

I often wonder how Zappa will be regarded in the future.  There have been other mysterious or hard-to-pigeonnhole composer/musicians of the past.  Renaissance motet composer Carlo Gesualdo wrote impossibly dissonant music for his time and is said to have murdered his wife.  What could they have thought of him in his time?  Erik Satie, who wrote piano pieces that are at first acquaintance imbecilic, are uniquely transcendent.  John Cage, told by Arnold Schoenberg that his poor instinct for harmony would be a barrier to success, devoted himself to bashing his head against and ultimately through that wall.

As much of a Frank fanboy I am, I don't have a prediction of the future's appreciation of him.  I can't claim to understand his catalogue, not the whole of it.  I saw Zappa perform live when I was barely 14.  (I reviewed it from recollection here.)  Later, at 20, It was hard for me to stomach when he dished out new kinds of gross-out humor, transparently juvenile to me, for the next crop of 14-year-olds.  I also didn't care for how his later writing increasingly incorporated 90's pop trends (at one point there was entirely too much reggae in everything), and his bands were less and less made up of oddball personalities and disparate geniuses from all corners of the musical universe, and more and more of technicians who memorized the notes and collected a paycheck.

But he could write amazing orchestra works with hints of Webern and Stravinsky (200 Motels), while still including the rude saxophone honk here or there and the punctuation of a broken cymbal crash at the end.  He used the occasion of a near-death concert accident in London...only 6 months after I saw him perform...to change directions from rock to composing, producing and playing from the wheelchair two fantastic jazz albums (Waka/Jawaka and The Grand Wazoo).  As early as 1967 he made electronic and tape-edited music (Lumpy Gravy) that today's computer-assisted electronica artists can only dream of creating.  His credentials as a rocker and guitarist are unquestioned, but his ability to create long-form rock-ensemble pieces like Little House I Used to Live In, Billy the Mountain, and the four-song medley from Apostrophe' (with the infamous Yellow Snow beginning) has no comparison with any other rocker.  He could keep you alternately surprised, smiling, or toe-tapping by hopping from dead-on imitations of broadway musicals to feel-good pop anthems, rock headbangers, abstruse jazz counterpoint or the theme from the Johnny Carson show with an ingenuity equalled only by Spike Jones in the 1940's.

Students at Pomona College once perfectly executed the sight gag of placing ZAPPA along side WAGNER, MOZART and BRAHMS on the frieze of stately and highfalutin' Bridges Auditorium.  While I hold Frank Zappa as dearly as the composers of Parsifal, the Rite of Spring and Concerto for Orchestra, I don't try to place him among them.  It's not a fit, and I don't need there to be one.  The conception of what Frank Zappa "was" is in a future we cannot yet fathom.  

Monday, November 11, 2019

Santa Cecilia Orchestra: El amor brujo and Mendelssohn's "Italian" Symphony


Flamenco dancer María Bermúdez performing El Amor Brujo

If one needed evidence for why Symphonic Music is the crown jewel of performing arts and worthy of the expense, then you needed only be at yesterday's concert of the Santa Cecilia Orchestra, conducted by Sonia Marie de Leon at Occidental College in Los Angeles to get all the evidence you need.

Maestra de Leon took on the challenging Symphony No. 4 ("Italian") by Felix Mendelssohn.  Mendelssohn, whose mastery of orchestration warrants more attention, used the full forces of orchestral color and challenging, fast passagework for strings in this work, and which the SCO executed handily, and flawlessly.  The dimensionality of Mendelssohn's writing, the play of timbres, blocks of sounds coming from different spatial locations, that can go unappreciated in a recorded performance, were scrumptiously on display in the wonderful acoustics of Occidental's Thorne Hall.  The echo of the room, as well as the spatial distance between players, gave the scurrying violin work in the first movement the sound of multiple lines in harmony with each other, even though the parts are written with no divisi.  Another wonderful moment occurred just before the recapitulation where the strings were busily working out a subsidiary theme in a crowded, murky texture, and the main theme appeared out of this sounding like a Cathedral rising out of the sea.  Passages where the French Horns had prominent, exposed material---a risk even for top flight orchestras---were executed flawlessly and with gusto by SCO's high calibre players.  The Occidental audience reacted to end of movement 1 with joyful, unrestrained applause, and a standing ovation at the end of the work.

The entire second half was occupied by an inspired concert staging of Manuel de Falla's ballet El amor brujo that should command the attention of the entire Los Angeles community as a landmark event in Performing Arts.  Guest Flamenco dancer, actress and singer María Bermúdez performed the written vocal parts accompanied by Flamenco dancing, danced as well to the instrumental orchestra movements, and again during added interludes by two performers from her critically acclaimed Sonidos Gitanos and Chicana Gypsy Project.  Her singing, as well as the singing of Pele de los Reyes (of the group Navajita Plateá), was not of the concert-hall opera-singer variety, but the full-throated, husky and passionate style of Moorish-influenced Spanish gypsies.  Yet she commanded the stage like a Maria Callas, and with her head high and looking into the infinite distance, she filled the far corners of the auditorium with her voice.  (If there was any amplified support to her singing, it was transparent to the audience.)  In the Danza ritual del fuego (Ritual Fire Dance) she multiplied her stature by two with brilliant, furious twirling and draping of her magnificent red shawl, the timed falling of the fabric perfectly in sync with the rhythms of the orchestra.  It commanded from the audience a lengthy standing ovation of its own, despite being only an inner movement.  The two added musicians, with virtuoso flamenco guitarist Andres Vadin (wearing a splendid black leather suit) helped complete the imagery, along with Ms. Bermúdez' beautiful costume, that a Barcelona Gypsy tavern had been lifted from Spain and placed on a Los Angeles stage.  Despite the fact that the interspersed movements from the Gypsy Project were creative additions by Maestra de Leon and the SCO, they mingled flawlessly with De Falla's 1915 score, and in doing so gave modern testimony to the veracity of De Falla's sources of inspiration.  Also notable were the solo contribution of first chair cellist Cathy Biagini, and the piano textures from performer Bryan Pezzone.

The concert also included "Dance of the Furies" from Gluck's Orfeo ed Euridice.  Heard from the foyer due to my late arrival to the concert, I detected the same mastery of performance that I heard in the "Italian" Symphony when I was seated.

It seems like the growth of the SCO, and its companion institution the Santa Cecilia Arts and Learning Center has no end in sight. The concerts keep getting better and better, with the Thorne Hall venue at Occidental supplying first rate support (sound engineering, ushering, lighting) commensurate with the professional calibre of their performing.

Sonia Marie de Leon with supporters after the concert


Wednesday, November 21, 2018

My Trip Through the Milky Way

I've been on a science spree lately.

A little over a year ago the National Geographic channel was showing a multi-episode series dramatizing the life and achievements of Alfred Einstein.  Using clever stories and images, the show did an impressive job bringing you a few steps closer to understanding hard-to-get-your-head around things, like Einstein's Time Dilation.  So I could really grasp it, though I embarked on an exploration of a few dozen YouTube videos on Time Dilation.  I finally understood it and why it happens.  Coolest of all is the fascinating proof of Time Dilation occurring on a human scale (i.e. not interstellar).

But that's for another blog post.  Since my Einstein fetish, I've moved onto curiosity about the Milky Way Galaxy.  It started with the question that most people ask about the Milky Way: "How can I see the Milky Way in the sky if I am in the Milky Way?" led me to learning the answers to a multitude of other questions.  

So here's how I'd explain the Milky Way to a friend.  Hopefully my explanation is not too marred by my very thin amount of scientific knowledge, and hopefully I didn't rely on bad sources, but if anyone spots anything, please feel free to tell me about it.


 How can we see a galaxy that we are in?

Artist's conception of the Milky Way (source)
Okay, you can't.  There are no photos of our galaxy.  The pics you see that show a spiral galaxy, and are labelled "Milky Way", are digital artistry, projections based on what other galaxies look like, and based on the clever measurements and inferences scientists can make.  Or, if it really is a photo, then it is a real pic of another galaxy.  "NGC 6744" is a spiral galaxy popularly used to show us what our own galaxy looks like.  Or you may be seeing a real photo, not of the Milky Way's entire spiral galaxy, but parts of the Milky Way stitched together from views in the sky.  See examples of these below.



Photo of Galaxy NGC 6744, having a spiral structure similar to the Milky Way's.  (source)
Composite of many sky images of the Milky Way taken at different times and locations, by Axel Mellinger. (source)

The Spiral Arms

The way to talk about where things are located in the Milky Way is by referencing the spiral arms of the Milky Way.  The schematic below wonderfully depicts what we need to know:
(source)
There's the Norma and Cygnus arms, Sagittarius, Scutum-Crux, and Perseus.  We (our solar system) reside in this dip-shit little afterthought of an arm called the "Orion Spur"!  It's closer to the edge of the Milky Way than the center, about 2/3 of the way out from the supermassive black hole "Saggitarius-A" at the galactic center.

"Far" is actually close


You've see those fantastic Hubble images, often of spectacular dust clouds (such as the so-called "Pillars of Creation")?  You probably know that they are impossibly far away and impossibly huge.  But where in the universe are they, in our galaxy, or another?  To put it another way, how far away are such things, on the Milky Way scale?  I'm sorry to tell you that they are barely off of our front porch in our Orion Spur!  Yes, these things whose distance from us that are beyond comprehension, whose light we see comprise photons that were emitted thousands of years ago...are right here in our "neighborhood".  The Pillars of Creation are a "mere" 7,000 light years away from us, putting them not only in our Milky Way, but still comfortably in our little neighborhood of the Orion spur (10,000 light years in length).  

Those wonderful Exoplanets we're learning about, the ones possibly hosting life, but whose citizens we have no hope of ever meeting, or vice-versa?  You guessed it:  in the Orion Spur.

For comparison, the center of our galaxy, super massive black hole Saggitarius-A, is 25,640 light years away.  The total width of the Milky Way is around 100,000 light years.  So, the rest of the universe?  Forget about it.  The Milky Way alone is just one of trillions of galaxies.  Feeling small, punk?

Answering the Big Question


Finally there was my big question, the one that took several videos and articles for me to understand:  when you see one of those photos taken in deep country, away from city lights, and there's a big, beautiful arc of colorful galactic soup that is the Milky Way...how can something that we are IN be something we can point to?

The answer was very cool to me.  It starts with describing the shape of the galaxy; it's a disk (not a sphere).  Better yet, to borrow Dave Fuller's illustration, it's more like a deep dish pizza:  a disk, but one with significant height.  Consider the pizza for a minute: looking at it from the top, our solar system would be a tiny fleck of pepper located 2/3 from the center.  But the fleck is not on the surface, we are inside the pizza.  Let's say the pizza is 1" high, and we are right in the middle, 1/2" down.

Look at the Sun in the Spiral Arms diagram above.  Which side of it are we on?  Well, that depends on the calendar.  When we are facing out, we are looking out towards part of the Perseus arm only, so we see what is around us in our Orion spur, and what is in the Perseus arm.  That's all.  That is when there is very little to see in the sky, not the source of many spectacular photos.  During the times we are facing in, we are seeing the superimposition of our Orion spur, Saggitarius arm, the Scutum Centaurus arm, the Norma arm, and the galactic center...and then back through the arms in reverse order again.  That's a lot of layers of lasagna, and what produces the really pretty photos.

Okay, back to our location inside the pizza.  Let's look around.  Turning around 360 degrees, looking straight ahead, we see cheese everywhere.  And there's more or less of that cheese, depending on whether we're facing inward or outward.  But we can look in other directions too:  upwards or downwards, past either the top or crust of the pizza, to whatever is above or below the Milky Way.

Now the mindblower:  when you look at the vertical stripe of the MW in the sky, that is you looking straight ahead through the pizza, looking at cheese, cheese, everywhere.  To the one side of the stripe is your "out and above" view from the pizza, and the other side of the strip is your "out and below" view from the pizza!

That's it, that's the awesome discovery.

Where are the Constellations?


I've got another disappointment for you.  Almost all those constellations we know and love, and the stars that comprise them, that are so impossibly far away, are once again...in our shitty little Orion Spur!  With a few exceptions, we don't see any points of light (stars, other galaxies, nebulae, etc.) that aren't in the Orion Spur.

"But wait," you ask:  You told us that the stuff to the left and right of the visible Milky Way band is us "looking out" beyond our galaxy...yet our favorite constellations are spread all over the night sky.  So don't those constellations have to exist outside the Milky Way, inside some other galaxy?  No.

I made that mistake too at first.  What I forgot is that our Orion Spur surrounds us in every direction.  When you're "looking out" you are still looking through the surroundings of the Orion Spur first, before you see the things that are "out there".


Will Voyager Take a Picture of the Milky Way?


The farthest human-made objects from earth are the two Voyager spacecraft launched between 1979 and 1980, and they keep going and going at 35,000 mph away from our solar system.  Will they leave the Milky Way, and in theory, be able to photograph the Milky Way?

I wish I could have answered, "yeah, got a sec?"  Because in 40,000 years, we'll at least get the first fly-by of a star other than our Sun: the star Gliese 445, about 4 light years away from earth.  And that is, you guessed it, still in the Orion Spur.  In fact, at it's narrowest, the Orion Spur is 3,500 light years, so Voyager will remain in the 'hood for at least 35 million more years.   After that, then?

As an object, bombarded by cosmic rays and high energy charged particles, Voyager could last another 100 million years before dissipating into dust, so we've got that going for us.  We do have a problem with power supply though; eventually, in fact, as soon as 2025, its onboard Plutonium-238 powerplant will cease to provide the power it would need for photos and communications.  But in theory, could Voyager someday be positioned to take that picture?

Unfortunately no, it won't leave the Milky Way, ever.  Voyager was supplied with the necessary rocket fuel to leave the sun's orbit; no extra fuel to achieve an escape velocity from the Milky Way, which itself is a gravitational/orbital system.  It will stay in Milky Way orbit forever, and like our sun, complete its circle around Saggitarius-A once every 230 million years.





Saturday, March 3, 2018

Remembering Frank Zappa and The Mothers in 1971


May 18, 1971 was the date of a concert by Frank Zappa and the Mothers of Invention at Bridges Auditorium in Claremont, CA.  I was a few weeks shy of 14, it was my first concert, and a life-changer.  And I had front-row seats, right under Frank's nose.

The Mothers at this time were the band of the albums Fillmore East – June 1971Just Another Band from L.A.; and to a lesser degree, Chunga's Revenge and 200 Motels (soundtrack).  

I distinctly remember the lineup including: Zappa, Mark Volman & Howard Kaylan (vocal), Ian Underwood (keyboards and sax), Aynsley dunbar (drums), Jim Pons (bass) and another keyboardist whom I assume was Bob Harris (in the photo above, behind Frank's left).  I vaguely recall seeing Don Preston, but I'm not sure about that.  There is a setlist of songs that were played at setlist.fm, much of which seems accurate to me.

I don't recall enough of the concert to provide a continuous narrative, but have strong recollections of specific moments, many of which have been added to by my bother Tony and our friend Brent Tannehill.  Here they are.  You'll need to know the albums I named above to follow all the references.

Zappa Himself

  • He was wearing bright "Easter colors," possibly pink pants and a yellow shirt
  • At concert opening, he introduced singers Mark Volman and Howard Kaylan as formerly of The Turtles, which drew expressions of surprise from the audience (including me).  Mark and Howie smiled appreciatively at their intro.
  • Zappa spent the concert on the far right side of the stage (stage left).  For the long stretches when he wasn’t playing, he leant casually against the proscenium arch and watched the theatrics approvingly, with much mirth and smiles
  • Visually, Zappa was an arresting site to anyone who first saw him for the first time in a photo.  Up close and in person, the effect was even stronger.  The blackness of his hair, the razor sharp nose, the emaciated body, the greasy mediterranean looks, were all very striking
  • His constant smoking was a surprise to me. It seemed to me like a very "bar band" thing that was uncommensurate with progressive Rock and Roll.  He wedged his cigarette between the nut and the tuning pegs of his guitar, and played while the thing burned away
  • His guitar was the SG with silver tailpiece he was known for during the period (and which Dweezil has been playing a likeness of in his Zappa Plays Zappa concerts).  His amp gear included Orange Amps, and of course he used the wah-wah a lot.

From “the Groupie Routine”


  • Mark Volman and Howard Kaylan were generally very visually entertaining, and good actors
  • Mark Volman had his shirt off to portray the pregnant groupie.  It was really out of my experience to see a portly fellow display himself that way. 
  • Mark Volman & Howard Kaylan were generally being pretty lewd with each other, e.g. Howie rubbing Mark’s rubbing his belly lasciviously.  That kind of homoerotic-tinged acting was pretty out there for me. 
  • The “number one with a bullet” thing over and over really made us laugh
  • The crazy noise distortion “I can’t STAND it!” part had great visuals from Zappa, he "fucked his amp with the guitar" a la Jimi Hendrix, with crazy legs dancing
  • As Jim Pons played the slow two-note riff that happens through much of the routine, he would just rock his weight from left to right feet in a slow rhythm.  Looked like a wedding band guy playing "a casual"
  • My reaction to the bit about the “enchilada wrapped with pickle sauce shoved up and down in between the donkey's legs until he can't stand it no more”...let's just say it was a kind of sexual fetishism I had no frame of reference for.  And all the more so because they repeated it many times, making me wish they'd stop.  Remember, I was 13.
  • I remember the bits about ’Bwana Dik’, which were really funny
  • "The Mudshark dance," consisted of Mark and Howie, putting their hands together in a fish-shape and making a swimming motion, often between their legs
  • The climax where they performed “Happy Together” was a surprise that created a lot of laughter

From “Billy the Mountain”


  • Frank announced that this was the first-ever performance
  • Jim Pons doing his George Putnam imitation had us in stitches.  
  • I remember “Studebaker Hoch” being the main character
  • Memorable Aynsley Dunbar moment:  coming from behind his drums to do “THE STUDEBAKER HOCH DANCING LESSON & COSMIC PRAYER FOR GUIDANCE featuring Aynsley Dunbar...  Twirlie, twirlie, twirlie…"
  • And he played the hell out of drums, including the 8-measure solo from the Fillmore album.  His drums moved around a lot from the force of his playing, and he kept on having to drag his bassdrum back towards him.  His energy was a big mover in that band.  And a very photogenic guy to boot.

Other things


  • Ian Underwood was pretty hidden behind the keyboards the majority of the time.  He seemed to crave no spotlight whatsoever or was concerned with showmanship.  Mostly you'd only see him when he "whipped out" his alto saxophone and played it high and sideways over the keyboards.   
  • The playing of Peaches en Regalia, with Aynsley Dunbar's note-perfect intro, got us all very excited
  • The crowd demanded an encore, but we got the feeling that Zappa hated encores, so instead of a song, they quickly did the “left hand from the heart-ah, right hand from the heart-ah” routine that eventually was part of Billy the Mountain.



Our Bootleg Tape Debacle



A recording of the concert might exist to this day were it not for teenage foolishness and naiveté. Tony smuggled in a small tape recorder for the concert; he remembers it being cassette, I remember it being a tiny reel-to-reel.  (You have to understand that affordable consumer-level recorders still were very rare in 1971, and the cassette medium too.)



At the end, proud of his accomplishment, Tony (15 years old) played the recording as we walked to the car.  We took a circuitous route that brought us behind the auditorium, where we could see Frank, along with band members, women, and roadies leaning against a truck.  I remember seeing the glow of one of his Winstons.  This motivated Tony to show "how cool he was" by making it even more audible to those around us, including Frank and party.  Next thing you know, Herb Cohen (we're pretty sure) makes a beeline towards us, and demands the tape.  To try to make it smart a little less, he offered $5 for it.  When we handed it over, rapidly unspooled it and threw it high up into some eucalyptus trees where we could never get to it, and walked back to the truck.



Well, however tragic, let's just call that a concert memory we'll never forget!

Thanks to Murray Gilkeson for the concert poster.